Our Professional Staff > Partner > |
|
Key Qualifications After obtaining LL.B. degree in Hong Kong, Mr. Tang went to London and graduated with a master degree in Laws, specialising in Intellectual Properties Law and Insurance Law. Throughout his training and practice, Mr. Tang has gained experience mainly in civil and commercial litigation and Arbitration (relating to contractual disputes, M & A disputes, debt recovery, personal injuries claims, employees' compensation, insurance related disputes, shareholders' disputes, defamation, land disputes, intellectual property rights disputes and etc. ); and non-contentious legal matters (relating to commercial contracts drafting, rendering advices on commercial transactions, trademark registration, government and certificates applications, shares transfer, conveyancing and etc.). |
 |
Education and Qualifications Bachelor of Laws, City University of Hong Kong, 1997 Postgraduate Certificate in Laws, City University of Hong Kong, 1998 Master of Laws, University of London, University College London, 2000 Solicitor of the High Court of Hong Kong, 2002 Member of The Law Society of Hong Kong, 2002 Solicitor at the panel of the Legal Aid Department
RECENT NEWS Winning of Court of Appeal Case Our partner Mr Albert Tang acting for China Minseng Banking Corporation Limited (Shenzhen Branch) has successfully won the case for the Bank as a result of which the Bank is now able to enforce a charging order on shares which were claimed by of Pearl Orient Innovation Limited. Parties claiming prior interest over the shares are Pearl Oriental Innovations Limited and Orient Day Development Limited but their case was dismissed by the Court of Appeal. The Court of Appeal also ordered them to fully indemnify the Bank ' s legal costs. The Bank is now able to sell the shares to enforce an arbitral award in its favour to satisfy a judgment sum of about RMB20 Million plus legal costs. The entire case from the commencement of proceedings to its dismissal in the Court of Appeal lasted more than 2 years. It involved deciding on complex issues such as whether a prior pledge equitable charge had been created over the shares before the Bank obtained its charging order. The case reference is Civil Appeal Nos. 155 and 156 of 2008.
|
|
| Top | |